In Defense of Prepositions
Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 9:33AM Any writer who has been at it for a while has already figured out the quick fixes to that so-called problem of having a preposition at the end of a sentence. They have learned how to use phrases like "for which," "in which," "to which," and so on. Most grammar officianadoes also know the phrase attributed to Winston Churchill, "this is the kind of tedious nonsense up with which I will not put." And I'd like to propose that we all stop putting up with it.
I'm not the first person to argue for a written language that more closely resembles the vernacular, and I won't be the last. I also have well-spoken friends who model their spoken language on written language, revising their words on the fly so that they don't accidentally end a phrase or a sentence with a preposition. It's a stylistic choice, and in all matters of style there will be a wide gamut of opinions and flavours of it's-okay-in-these-circumstances-but-not-those-circumstances.
To get to the point. It makes my brain twitch when common phrases and idioms are broken up to satisfy the preposition rule. Force to be reckoned with, and put up with, are two examples which come to mind immediately, but I have edited and corrected several phrases that naturally end with a preposition, but have been tweaked so that that little word is no longer concluding things. I argue that it's more of a strain on your readers to mentally reassemble these phrases in their natural order, than it is for them to figure out what the ending preposition is supposed to be modifying.
That's one of the reasons why prepositions are not supposed to be at the end--to make it clear that this preposition goes with this word. Another reason is because English likes to pretend that it's Latin sometimes, but if that were the case, everyone would understand the genitive case and possessive apostrophes would never be sprinkled all over the place. Aside from Latin scholars, the average reader does not remember the Latin rules of grammar, nor do they remember how those rules supposedly apply to modern English.
I love the written word. I love a well-crafted sentence. When I see a sentence that has been crafted to deliberately avoid placing a preposition at the end, I can even appreciate that--as long as it does not make my brain twitch. A few months ago, I went grammar nazi on Marc at The Eagle & Child over misplaced commas. He argued that some arbitrary grammar rules seem illogical, and posited a change that seemed logical to him. I would have none of it.
You may have none of this, but I would just like to encourage you to consider the nature of our messy, ridiculous language, and accept that a few broken rules may capture its essence more than following old Latin ones.
rilla |
9 Comments |
work 

